I didn’t cite your scientific work in my book, because it is just not relevant to my point. The Genealogical Adam and Eve is not an argument for evolutionary science, as you well know. So your work is just not relevant.
Here you are wrong, because when it comes to Adam and Eve, it would be specifically scientific to disprove alternative explanatory models. So science works by disproving competing theories. Now that you don’t even take a stand on the right scientific model of young earth creationists that Jeanson presents, you haven’t disprove the truly explanatory model of creationists for Adam and Eve. In other words, if you claim the creationists of a young earth are wrong and the theory of evolution is right, then you should show how the creationist model is not explanatory. Now you haven’t even commented on it in your book. From the perspective of our creationists, you have now only criticized the straw man. In the next short video, Nathaniel Jeanson explains in more detail.
Why scientists believe evolution - https://youtu.be/KR6gX_7MCcU