Welcome @Wenlok. It is a pleasure to meet you. You have some great questions. The most important one, of course, is…
Considering Vs. :
As a scientist, I’d request that you produce them, and we test them to find out. My hypothesis is that it depends how we define “stronger,” which is a far more nuanced term than one might expect. By some definitions, the unicorn will win, by others the gorilla will.
Not a Theistic Evolutionist
Next, I want to emphasize that I am not a theistic evolutionist. I am a Christian that affirms evolutionary science, which is a mouthful. So you can just call me a confessing scientist if you like. As I’ve explained before:
I still affirm evolutionary science, but I no longer am a theistic evolutionist . Since I first became public in my work, I have never been intent on evangelizing evolution. For this reason, I am not well defined as an “ evolutionist .” My worldview does not rest on evolution; it rests on Jesus, the one who rose from the dead. I am not well defined as a “ theist ” either, because I see great evil in this world justified by generic (and specific) theism; and I follow Jesus, who is much greater than theism.
The Confessing Scientist
I Respect Your Path
You write:
In addition to me, take a moment to talk to @sygarte too. He was a scientist with this happened to him:
Any how, the step you are taking to move away from a man-made faith is risky, brave and honorable. I wrote recently to a high schooler:
I do not know where your journey will lead you, but I have great respect for those that leave the religion of their parents. It is a difficult thing to do, and in some parts of the world comes with severe consequences.
With those key preliminaries stated, I’ll try and hit some (or all?) of your questions in the next post.