It looks like Andrew Snelling has published the results of his Grand Canyon research:
It turns out that it’s a study of the rock formation that he claims isn’t fractured even though photos clearly show that it is. He seems to be trying to refute the idea that it has undergone plastic deformation, but if I understand the issue correctly, plastic deformation would only be necessary to explain the folding if the formation hadn’t been fractured, and as can be seen from the photographs, quite clearly it has.
I’d be interested to know if the geologists among you have any specific observations to make about it. Any thoughts?