Not in depth. But from what I have read, he makes the error of going from the position that the earliest Christians believed Jesus rose from the dead, to the conclusion that he really did.
I do not deny that the resurrection was part of Christian belief from its earliest days.
The explanation is simple, and requires no miracles or supernatural events, just awareness and acknowledgement of an obvious fact that is all around us: Religious believers believe dumb things for no good reason. It’s part of what marks a religion. The polite word for this is “faith”. It’s the same thing that caused the earliest Muslims to believe Muhammad was talking directly with God, also for no good reason. I suspect you have no problem agreeing with me on that one, do you?