Ashwin and Jonathan discuss the Incarnation and the Trinity

[Jonathan_Burke]

And John would easily present details on why he believes so.

And I’ve seen you simply ignore them. So I know how you respond to evidence.

This is just a logical argument. It’s accessible to anyone who makes an effort.

Yes, it’s called the law of non-contradiction.

When you study the argument, you understand the nuances involved.

For example, are you aware of the logical proposals for the Trinity based on relative identity? And of course the paradoxes involved in a concept of absolute identity?

Yes. As I’ve already demonstrated, I’m familiar with all three standard approaches. In the literature there is still no agreement on any of them. It’s acknowledged in the literature that the issue remains open. So go forth, write your killer paper and win over the scholarly consensus. It should be easy, right?