So, that is not quite right. I was going from memory. I don’t think they were retracted, but they were controversial. This was in 2005, in the lead up to Dover. I give great credit to Protein Science for publishing this.
Editorial Board: Editorial and position papers
It was clear when all of the correspondence was analyzed by the editors and reviewers that no useful purpose would be served by opening this topic up to “Letters,” since there was no real dialog, just statements of position. Prof. Lynch’s approach of testing the problem raised by Drs. Behe and Snoke within the modern framework of evolutionary biology represents the desirable scientific approach (Lynch 2005, this issue; Behe and Snoke 2005, this issue). As Bruce Alberts wrote in a Letter to the Editor of the New York Times (Feb. 12, 2005): “In evolution, as in all areas of science, our knowledge is incomplete. But the entire success of the scientific enterprise has depended on an insistence that these gaps be filled by natural explanations, logically derived from confirmable evidence.”
If I find any more papers in this exchange, I will add them here.