Nope. Not at all. I have no reason or motivation to discredit Doug. I’ve just been inviting him into dialogue. The fact he does not show up, well that does seem to create some problems for his credibility. It need not be this way of course.
Regarding Doug’s study, however, it has several problems. As we have already discussed ad infinitum.
You are joking right? That is a large portion of my research. Of course I have done this.
You don’t have to agree with me, or go through it. I’ll step out of the conversation. Work it out with @mercer and @art if you like. The claims Doug is making just do not add up.