What about the other >5000 papers, Ann?
Do you not realize that I chose this individual paper because its subject is beta-lactamase, but there are plenty of other successful trials?
Do you not realize that I chose this individual paper because they successfully found activity in a nonimmunized library, falsifying your claim that this method requires multiple rounds of selection?
Do you not realize that phage display is a modification of the original scheme?
Do you not remember writing:
Does the beta-lactamase paper not answer this question “yes, at a frequency of more than 1 in 10^8?”
Does the original Schultz paper not address the criticisms you’re brought up regarding the beta-lactamase paper?
Why have you avoided mentioning, and apparently avoided reading, any other catalytic antibody papers?