Bill Cole points out a good test for the "FI" hypothesis

[colewd (Bill Cole)]

@Rumraket

Data cannot be evidence for a hypothesis if the hypothesis does not actually predict the data. And you do not have an ID hypothesis that has predicted this result, hence it’s not evidence for ID.

The hypothesis is the data will supports design (mind) as a mechanism. It does that exactly. Just as starlight curving around the sun supported mass(energy) as a mechanism. How many times do I have to repeat this