Classic Progressive Creation Literature?

I disagree. Science operates under MN, so bringing in religious presuppositions should not be even allowed into a science discussion as then the discussion is no longer MN and isn’t science anymore, it’s theology. I for one, don’t think the line is blurry at all. Evolutionary Biology is science. TE, EC, PC, ID, OEC, YEC aren’t. Each one of these are in the realm of theology (or ideology or philosophy in the case of ID) that operates under non-MN so isn’t science. It is my hope that if one understands the science better, one could adjust their own beliefs to get rid of any tension, distress, or discomfort in their own lives between the present day scientific results and their own faith beliefs.

If, in the next few days, weeks or months, I or some else posts a new scientific results that cause you to cringe instead of being in awe, well then its your biases and beliefs that need adjustment not the science.

1 Like