Comments on Jeanson Accuses Duff Again

[Toni_Torppa]

@David_MacMillan

Can you provide any example of a prediction he made, which predicts evidence NOT expected under the mainstream model, which could be confirmed or falsified by actual experiment?

I have already pointed out

@Toni_Torppa

I remind that in the book Replacing Darwin, Jeanson walked the Reader through very detailed calculations on what the rates of speciation might be. Shortly after the publication of Jeanson’s book, a study of the famous Darwin’s Finches was published. These research findings were a scientific confirmation of the predictions made by Jeanson in the book. So Jeanson’s book meets the golden standard of science, it produces testable predictions that are now ironically confirmed by the famous evolutionary icon (Darwin’s Finches.) In these links, more of the findings that confirm Jeanson’s predictions in the book.

• A Bombshell for Replacing Darwin? - A Bombshell for Replacing Darwin? | Answers in Genesis
• A Second Bombshell for Replacing Darwin? Darwin’s finches further confirm predictions of landmark creationist book - A Second Bombshell for Replacing Darwin? | Answers in Genesis

In this light of the golden standard of science, Jeanson’s book not only hits right, but is a rare exception in the world of science because it dares to put its content directly into a test that is truly scientific.