What does that mean? Do you accept common descent for primates or not, and if you do, why do you do so, and if you do not, why don’t you? Do you apply that criterion consistently? Do you reject the common descent of different species of rats or mice for that same reason?
You are not “open”, you are pretending to be open. Paying vacuous lip-service to the idea of being “open” because you recognize that would be the more rational thing to do and you want to at least give the appearance of being that. But you know you aren’t. You’re making that statement basically to try and avoid having to deal with the question at any depth at all.
No, you stated Jeanson’s model is supported by experimental evidence, and both John and I have been asking you to elaborate on what exactly you think in Jeanson’s model that has been experimentally supported.
I will concede one thing, which is the question is rhetorical in the sense that I obviously already know there is no such experiment, and you were simply saying whatever science-sounding nonsense came to you in the moment.
I know this because we’ve been arguing now for the better half of a decade and you engage in this same silly behavior every time. So predictable are you that people who’ve only had about a year’s interaction with you can basically summarize your entire discursive behavior in a few bulletpoints.