Darwinism Falsified in Science Long Ago?

[swamidass (S. Joshua Swamidass)]

@Mung

The more interesting question, in my mind at least and perhaps also in yours, is whether Neo-Darwinism as defined by the scientists who defend it (not as defined in ID), is still the reigning paradigm.

No this is just false. Kimura replaced Darwinism in 1968. No need to make up a pseudo history. Neo-Darwinism as understood within science was falsified a long time ago. Evolutionary science is not in and of itself an ideology anyways.