People at DI have been pretty consistent about using neo-Darwinism, and it means random mutation and natural selection to them. That’s how Steve Meyer uses it consistently. I have tried to get people to add in genetic drift and recombination with limited success. I think epigenetics would now be included, but outside neo-Darwinism.
It’s funny though. You were directly contradicting something I wrote, and I think my knowledge of what the “ID movement” means by Darwinism is more accurate than yours.
I am going to be prickly here. You don’t like us to use the term Darwinism or neo-Darwinism. You say it’s out dated. Fine. I have told you our reasons which are valid. Maybe we should use the names pre-Kimura and post-Kimura evolution. That will really make things clear.