That doesn’t provide a reason why they’re wrong. Nor does it take out agency, unless you mean something mystical by that word.
Well, at least it’s a word that means what you think it means. So progress, I suppose. But no, materialists don’t say it’s an illusion. But here we’re back to arguing about whether libertarian free will is incoherent. By “agency”, you mean something outside of causality and yet non-random. What could that mean?
No. Apparently “brain-dead” is another term that doesn’t mean what you think it means. You don’t come back from being brain-dead to report on your experiences.
Yet again you cite this dubious, third-hand claim. Don’t believe it for a second. And let’s recall that natural selection may be mindless, but it’s not unguided. So the relevance of this “gotcha” moment is slight, even if it actually happened even once.
Yes. Stop digging.
That would help.
That’s you mixing those two separate topics again, right after saying you’d try not to. Please try harder. And the Egnor bit was irrelevant because it had nothing to do with the questions you were supposedly responding to.