Dispel those doubts with this article:
Dear Dr. Craig,
I love your work and your tireless efforts to spread the message of Christ in a intelligent, articulate manner! You have personally brought me to faith in Christ and delivered me, through your various articles and debates, from an...
(While this article is from 2012, he posted it on his Facebook page just today, so I can only assume it still reflects his current views.)
Craig leans heavily on Ayala, and the argument that Ayala believes “neo-Darwinism is dead”.
If anyone is interested in what Ayala really thinks, there is a decent article found here:
At the outset it must be said that - unlike attacks by creationists and other nonscientists - none of these challenges denies that evolutionary change occurs, that current species have descended from common ancestors or that Darwinian natural selection plays an important part in the process. The disputes are conflicts of degree and emphasis within a shared evolutionary outlook. We believe, moreover, that with modifications both to the traditional views and to the competing theories most of the challenges can be accommodated within the encompassing vision of the synthetic theory.The Evolution of Darwinism
1 Like
Mercer
April 26, 2019, 8:27pm
5
Rumraket:
Uhh, no, there is nothing in science that works like this. Scientific theories aren’t accepted merely for being the best ones among proposed candidate explanations.
That’s the falsehood that they have to sell.
All IDCreationists try to portray science as mere interpretation instead of actively testing hypotheses. If they portrayed science accurately, it would be more obvious that they aren’t doing any.