Does methodological naturalism become philosophical naturalism in public discourse?

Really? If there are, why do you, as an engineer, use handwaving like “huge” instead of specifying?

Name ten. And remember, the “huge number of them” you are naming must suffer from “self-imposed blindness.”

“A lot” is too vague to be meaningful. You’ve already failed to support your claim of knowing that

Please stop making claims about views that you can’t be bothered to ask about.

How can they be both “small” and “a lot”? Are they respected for their science, or for their views on atheism?

I take exception to your vague claims about what other people believe.