No, that is not true. The review is EXCLUSIVELY. ABOUT. THE. BOOK. Why would you think any different? It is a review of Darwin Devolves.
No, I do NOT accept that he has fully engaged with others. He has inadequately responded to them. He has made many responses, yes, but these responses have not been successful. He has also been studious in avoiding mention of some of his strongest critics. He has refused to engage some of the strongest refutations of his books.
Would you like to know about criticism he has not engaged??