6 or so years ago, I came on here to see what the scientific community had to say about Genetic Entropy. Since then, several debates have been had, but one thing that stands out is how nearly every evolutionist who attempts to refute GE seems to take incompatible routes to do so. That should probably tell us something. Coming up on May 13, another debate will be had, this time against a scientist who places himself in the “Population Genetics” specialty. This may be the first time this will have happened! I encourage you all to tune in and see how it goes–it should be interesting if nothing else.
Many members will recall @UncensoredPilgrims as @PDPrice. He no longer has access to the PDPrice login, but I am satisfied it is the same person.
Since this post is announcing an upcoming debate on Genetic Entropy, I’m guessing Paul will prefer to save that discussion until May (so maybe we don’t need to rehash it all again now?).
2 Likes
So Paul (@UncensoredPilgrims ), the last we saw you was about six years ago when you were still with ICR CMI. I think you left ICR CMI shortly after (thus the lost login?) and I’ve seen your name pop up occasionally. What have you been up to all this time?
Dan, to be precise, it was CMI, not ICR. Since then, I have been enjoying family life and working in the corporate world, which I must say I mostly prefer!
1 Like
These so-called ‘debates’ are always funny to me.
If GE was a legitimate biological phenomena, then experiments should be conducted to demonstrate its existence and relative effects, and these would be published in the primary biology literature. Then further study could be undertaken accordingly.
Instead by regulating these sorts of things to ‘debates’ on YouTube, it will just be another round of professional creationists preaching to the already converted, while giving those who aren’t more things to continue to dunk on.
1 Like