Wow. That’s just breathtakingly false.
I am pointing out that YOU are misrepresenting the evidence presented in that paper. YOU are claiming that the graph refers to something different than the published paper’s description.
The point is that YOUR claim in the online article under YOUR NAME is objectively false, Paul. Can you explain this bizarre idea that I should publish in the same journal? It’s not a good one.
But following your argument, I should publish on your web site. Are you cool with that?