No. I comprehend that this is the case.
How is it that you are so lacking in imagination that you cannot arrive at an intuitive understanding of such matters?
The issue isn’t lack of imagination. Of course I’m well aware that it is the case that there are people who are employed and trained scientists who also hold various religious beliefs. But it seems to me they hold their religious beliefs in spite of being scientists, on extremely weak if not contradictory evidence.
Virgin births, of males no less, is not a belief that is upheld by any scientific finding. If anything, science should cause you to doubt that such a thing did ever take place. Which implies it’s just faith, on zero evidence, and with plenty of scientifically good reasons to actually strongly doubt.
This is where some religious scientists invoke something like divine intervention. But then that isn’t a scientific belief. It’s just belief. What upholds it? Scripture? What do we know scientifically about human psychology, sociology, and human culture, regarding religious beliefs and all sorts of human cognitive biases? All the findings of science testify to religion being, essentially, “man-made”. A product of various human cognitive biases, sociological effects, pattern seeking, self-deception, hyperactive agency detection. All that stuff. Pass a story through ten people by word of mouth, and have them believe it religiously, what you get out the other end is, pardon the phrase, a deformed mutant. We know humans do this, every time.
In every way possible, science should cause you to stop believing, or at the least extremely strongly doubt, all your religious beliefs.