Now you’ve admitted that the models use fitness as a “rough proxy” for genetic entropy - and claimed that increases in fitness don’t produce proportionate decreases in genetic entropy so it can;t be a good proxy - we’ve reached the point where genetic entropy is just speculation or assumption. There is no way to measure it. Models don;t even count as data anyway - but models that are only assumed to be good certainly cannot be seen as evidence.
GE isn’t even a datapoint. Neither is your idea that God said that the Earth is young - which you tried to bring up in a similar argument. And certainly it is possible to claim consilience when multiple strong lines of evidence point to the same conclusion - even if there are a few weak outliers.