Is PS Against Using Scientific Arguments as Evidence for God's Existence?

[nwrickert (Neil Rickert)]

@Eddie

But it does attempt to show that, purely on the level of science, it has not been demonstrated that no design in nature exists, or that every event that has ever happened in the universe can be explained sufficiently without any recourse to design.

This is philosophy. And scientists should be wise enough to leave that to the philosophers and theologians.

@Eddie

The only parts of mainstream science they don’t accept are some parts concerning origins questions.

Ahem! What about climate science (or atmospheric physics)?