Is PS Against Using Scientific Arguments as Evidence for God's Existence?

[Timothy_Horton]

@IDC apologist

Regarding opposition to mainstream science, you should be aware that ID leaders accept about 99.8% of what you are calling mainstream science (astronomy, chemistry, physics, geology, physical geography, oceanography, biochemistry, neurology, physiology, most areas of biology…), so it is not as if they are irrational reactionaries against science. The only parts of mainstream science they don’t accept are some parts concerning origins questions.

Right. So Meyer’s Darwin’s Doubt didn’t argue for the Designer creating all phyla body plans in the Cambrian. And Behe’s Darwin Devolves doesn’t argue for the Designer coming by and doing the work evolution couldn’t do itself.

Somewhere Baghdad Bob is smiling and applauding.