All right, I got off track. But you still need to show how OOL has made net progress on homochirality, after claiming they had a good answer for this.
And my reply has been that this shows getting halfway back to where they had claimed to be. Not even halfway back, actually! Only RNA was addressed, there are lots of molecules that need to be homochiral. So no net progress yet.
In a sword duel, if a person withdraws, it’s not typically for the reason you give.
If Axe claims his results only apply for this mutated form of a protein, then yes, he should not claim this applies to proteins in general. But the authors in the paper you pointed to said more work needs to be done for the other nucleotides, implying their results did not apply more generally.
As I always ask, how and where? Please (again) point to one point people have made in the Douglas Axe thread that has gone unaddressed, which has proved unanswerable.
So how does Swamidass’ point not address the question, and so on? So again, please point to a post I did which is just a “bunch of words” that don’t address what someone said?