Kenneth Kemp: Adam and Eve and Evolution

[AntoineSuarez]

Thanks Joshua for inviting me to express my thoughts.
I am glad that your book has been reviewed by Kenneth Kemp.

His main objection is very much in line with what I objected in this post:

@AntoineSuarez

So I consider the following GA model:

1. At the time of Adam’s sin there were on earth non-Adamite people who were morally responsible but did not share the consequences of Adam’s sin.
2. These non-Adamite people went into marriage and lived with the genetic descendants of Adam, nonetheless the non-Adamites did not acquire the state of original sin.
3. The offspring of marriages of Adamites with non-Adamites come into existence in the state of original sin.

I would be thankful to know whether or not you endorse this GA model.

In any case, for me this model is theologically incoherent:

If it is possible that moral responsible people without “original sin” live together with people in state of “original sin” (as Point 2 assumes), there is no reason why “their offspring has to be in state of original sin” (as Point 3 claims).

If you claim you can provide a reason, it would be nice you post it here so we can discuss it. Otherwise I would abandon this conversation in all respect.

As far as I am aware, you have not yet answered to this post.
This would be useful yet, after Kemp’s review.
Thanks in advance.