Murray and Churchill: Mere Theistic Evolution

38 posts were split to a new topic: The Fine-Tuning Argument and ID arguments

2 posts were merged into an existing topic: Paul Nelson and Omphalos

Um, no? Like TE, “evolution” lacks specificity. I think of it in terms of three separate definitions:

  1. Change in biological populations over time. (Descent with modification, change in allele frequencies.) Everyone agrees with this. ID/YEC fully compatible.

  2. UCD. Some IDists agree, others do not. ID fully compatible. All YECs disagree. YEC incompatible.

  3. NDE as mechanism for all biological diversity. All YEC/IDs disagree. All TEs agree with some minor qualifications. M&C made this all but explicit.

3 posts were split to a new topic: Independent Patterns and Homology

37 posts were split to a new topic: MTE, EC and the GAE