It seems to me that on a general principle borrowed from the game of Jenga(h/t @T_aquaticus), you would predict that more ancient developmental pathways are in general also more resistant to developmental systems drift. Things that get established first have things added on top of them(sort of like the law of superposition), and so over time become more and more resistant to change without destabilizing the whole system added on top.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homology and embryonic development | 8 | 571 | February 14, 2022 | |
| JeffB and Swamidass: Understanding Evidence for Phylogeny | 88 | 3184 | May 8, 2021 | |
| Gpuccio on Common Descent | 1 | 750 | August 26, 2019 | |
| Nested Clades in Intelligent Design | 10 | 897 | March 2, 2019 | |
| Cornelius Hunter: Arguments Against Common Descent | 6 | 1891 | July 24, 2018 |