My take is that it’s a storm in a teacup.
Consider what the draft standards actually say about evolution:
Evolution is an explanation for the unity and diversity of organisms, living and extinct.
The theory of evolution seeks to make clear the unity and diversity of living and extinct organisms.
Nothing objectionable there. I imagine some people from the NCSE might want the standards to read: “Evolution is the only true explanation [or: the only possible explanation] for the unity and diversity of organisms, living and extinct.” However, real scientists don’t talk in such dogmatic terms.
There’s absolutely no mention of intelligent design in the draft standards, either.
What about climate change? Here’s what the draft standards say:
Fossil fuels, frequently used in power stations and generators, are a limited resource and their combustion contributes to global warming and climate change.
Changes in the atmosphere due to human activity have increased carbon dioxide concentrations and thus affect climate.
Moreover, anthropogenic changes (induced by human activity) in the environment - including habitat destruction, pollution, introduction of invasive species, overexploitation, and climate change - can disrupt an ecosystem and threaten the survival of some species.
But human activity is having positive and negative impacts on biodiversity through overpopulation, overexploitation, habitat destruction, pollution, introduction of invasive species, and climate change.
There’s absolutely nothing here that a climate scientist could object to.