“I presume that humans and chimps share common ancestry.”
I would be very interested to know why Mr. Klinghoffer presumes this. Also why he uses the word “presume”, which suggests an opinion easily abandoned given evidence, with which he would be unfamiliar. Is he in fact acquainted with the relevant data, and if so what conclusion can he reach, and how strongly?
It’s amazing that they try to claim the moral high ground re: animal cruelty when the Discovery Institute is one of the purveyors of climate change denialism. I guess we’ll just forget the impact climate change has on global ecosystems and species extinction, while pretending the DI is somehow in favor of animal welfare.
The ironic twist regarding animal lovers being inhumane to people is a classic Hemingway rationalization. Rationalization and religious sectarianism cut a deep and wide path through the DI. Apparently, because Hitler had a favorite dog–a German shepherd named Blondi–bullfighting, a vile and disgusting “sport” akin to dog fighting and cock fighting is OK. Sounds like old Dominionism b-llsh-t to me…….
Live Science fluff article published this morning eventually gets around to agreeing with @GutsickGibbon. It missed the point that most of the differences are still non-functional and not regulatory.