No, he does not. Him declaring, stating, insisting, or fantasizing reasons isn’t providing any actual support. It is worth even less than personal testimony when assessing drug efficacy, because with drugs some times the desired effect is that of altering the state of your consciousness (painkillers, to pick an example).
Here’s an example of someone with engineering qualifications declaring on the basis of their intuitions and experience what is and isn’t possible, and being laughably wrong. For the entire thread.
I laugh every time someone makes this fatuous appeal to “dude I’m a PhD”. It is worthless. This “bow before my academic credentials” S H I T E people pull, some on this very forum. And you’re the worst of them all, appealing to literal crackpots just because they have sort sort of title. It’s pathetic.
Yes as an engineer he should have the capacity to do some sort of test and/or simulation work at the very least, but does neither.
So it remains an unsubstantiated assumption, and in fact a suspicious one when he should have the qualifications to do tests but never does them.
Data, got any? No.