If microscopes are just as feasible in a non-designed universe as a discoverable by design universe, in what sense do they or any other apparatus constitute evidence? What difference would you expect to find?
1 Like
by seeking dialogue in discord and understanding across disagreements,
âŚby fostering interdisciplinary scholarship engaged with science and the public.
I beg to differ. Scientific Atheists bring Hate, argument and contempt for others to the scientific community. Some was Mentioning Dawkins. And his buddy⌠They have done more to Harm Science than anyone on the planet. This site and Francis Bacon would be and should be alarmed at that base behavior from so called smart people.
Its so bad that someone like Francis Collins will likely say he is a Evolutionist his whole life and may not even on his death bed say he is a creationist because of the abusive behavior of Atheist Scientists. Cancel Culture, PTSD, Al-Anon and other words come to mind.
Science is the study of puzzle pieces and its disciplines are to help Humans use the information to their benefit. It is not a tool to urinate on other people with.
Regularly I have found many Proud so called âAtheist Scientistsâ good at book learning but not very smart. There is a difference. Its unfortunate that almost always, with a few exceptions Atheists have something stuck when it comes to dealing with people that disagree with them.
I have seen this over the years, between Atheists that are Smart and Atheists that are not. Both have this bent. Its not scientific. Its not learned helplessness its their choice. The smarter ones have more liability for their behavior.
This behavior is not reserved for Science, its seen in religion with a top down thumb on others. Its seen in Govât its seen between husband and wife and its seen in the play ground.
Discovery and collaboration is what we have a debt too. Not to Atheists. They bring something negative to the table.
How so? Any Christian can do the work of discovery. Ask Francis Bacon. And many big shot break through scientists in our history were Creationists. A Atheist brings negativity. A Christian Creationist brings Expectation that it is right, that there is a explanation and you can leap forward and make a even more grand Hypothesis. I personally have two inventions I am working on because of such âleaps of faithâ meaning I trust that it has to be possible because I trust the one who made things. It allows me to make assumptions skip what I donât know and move way forward and work my way back.
Anyways. If anyone had done any research into the first sin, it was⌠Contempt. It is the fatal flaw. I have no problem with Trust but verify, but it is also a fire that will destroy families, Political parties and Science. Its a subject all on its own. The Original Sin.
WE have a debt to the curious. The people willing to look and question to find more answer. Not to the Atheist.
Scott, in the geology thread, I asked others to treat you with civility and despite your amateurish lecturing on topics that others know far better than you, they did.
It is very poor form to repay the patience you were shown with posts like this. Your post complaining about hateful atheists shows a great deal of the behavior that you are applying to others, while those you are labeling as âhatefulâ have treated you with dignity and respect.
Please contemplate what your ill-targeted post has done to your credibility and your witness.
I do not like calling anyone out publicly, but feel it is necessary since I specifically asked others to treat you respectfully.
4 Likes
Sorry, but itâs hard to understand you. I think the beam in your eye may be interfering with your typing.
3 Likes
Provide examples, from the comments of forum members who are atheist scientists, to support this claim.
I would agree that Dawkins has at times gone beyond the science, but that pales in comparison to the extensive and continuous harm inflicted on science by Hammites, CMItes, etcetera. Your poor approach to science is a product of that harm.
Francis Collins accepts evolution because it is a fact and he accepts evolutionary theories due to their immense explanatory power and evidence base.
By the way there are a lot of Atheist scientists on this forum, please provide evidence of them being abusive to Christian scientists in their comments. If you canât, I would suggest @moderators ban you.
Provide evidence that atheist scientists on this forum have used science as âa tool to urinate on other people withâ.
I believe this also applies to a lot of people who arenât atheists. Why you chose to single out atheists eludes me.
It is people who discover and collaborate and that includes atheist scientists. You are not smart, I see.
Similarly, many great scientists were atheists. Stephen Hawkings and Francis Crick are notable examples.
We are discussing atheist scientists not atheists in general.
Francis Crick and Stephen Hawkings, both atheists, carefully made observations and asked questions. Similarly, Isaac Newton, a devout Christian, inquired and studied meticulously. In all three instances, they were doing science which is independent of their atheist or theist backgrounds. Applying the scientific method allowed those men make their discoveries. Science is neutral so doesnât give two hoots about oneâs religious background and thatâs why we find scientists from all walks of life.
2 Likes
He was trying to paraphrase my argument, which is fine.
The problem is that @Eddie did not even remotely understand what I was saying, and is trying to blame that on me. Thatâs pretty funny.
3 Likes
This thread is well past its expiry date.
6 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 3 minutes. New replies are no longer allowed.