Paul Price: What are the Substantive Critiques of Genetic Entropy?

[T_aquaticus]

@PDPrice

Let me understand you: you are arguing that if somebody agrees with anything written in any peer-reviewed source, that they should, in turn, agree with everything written in every peer reviewed source?

Earlier, you were chiding us for supposedly ignoring conclusions from a peer reviewed paper, were you not?

@PDPrice

But the words of God do invalidate faulty speculations about the past.

You would first need to demonstrate that they are faulty, and also demonstrate that what you have are the words of God.

@PDPrice

Actually, they are, in essence, assumed.

Actually, they aren’t. If constants and laws were different in the past then it should show up in observations of distant stars and in the rocks on Earth. We don’t assume constants and laws were the same in the past, we conclude they were the same in the past because of the evidence.