Regardless @PDPrice this all misses point of my original question. Let me try rephrasing. This is a key question for you to answer that can help put to rest a lot of confusion.
We can agree that several scientists, hear and elsewhere, claim to have read Sanford’s work on Genetic Entropy and disagree with it.
Many of them have explained why they disagree with the validity of understanding Genetic Entropy as a challenge for evolution, and why they disagree with key points of Sanford’s reasoning.
Sanford and @PDPrice disagree with these critical scientists.
Without agreeing with these critiques, @PDPrice, can you repeat to us, accurately, these objections and the reasoning behind these objections?
Do you dispute #1, #2, or #3? I don’t think you do. So can you answer #4? That was my question. Can you answer that question? If you can, please do.