There is no use going on and on with this subject when we’ve already seen that you have no real evidence for GE. That is to say, that there’s no good empirical evidence that the distribution of fitness effects of mutations you imagine is actually true, because none of the references you give show that there are so many mutations of invisible deleterious effect that fitness decline is inevitable and unavoidable.
That you change the definition of fitness away from reproductive fitness, to some nebulous and unquantifiable verbal idea having to do with “the integrity of information in the genome” when the predictions of the invented DFE of mutations you use are contradicted by observation.
And that you invent unquantifiable ad-hoc hypotheses (like the idea that the degree of “simplicity” affects the rate of fitness decline) to handwave away serious questions.