Perspectives on Discussion of Science and Religion

And to be even more fair, maybe mentioned it directly to me, instead of third parties?

Wow, Don. Have you never considered the impression YOU have made?

Let’s go back to your first appearance here:

Continuing the discussion from Is Evolutionary Theory a Fallacy?:

You never replied to Michael’s polite, respectful question! Your dodging spoke volumes.

You told us clearly what you thought of us right off the bat. And there’s the revealing bit where you obviously derived your judgment of a whole field of biology (not just theory) on a single book written by a single, very arrogant guy.

Do you not see your book, which you started here by touting, as an explicit claim to understand biology and biology education better than the experts do? Do you not think that if you had approached this forum pseudonymously and asked questions, that we would have interacted with you very differently?

Golden Rule, man.

But would any of us have responded in an intimidating way if you softened your rhetoric, not just a little bit, but a whole lot? Why write a whole book claiming that we don’t know what we’re doing, on a subject you admit you know so little about?

Don, if you think that your accusing me of:

made any sense at all, wasn’t incredibly rude to me, or should have been handled more respectfully by me, please explain it to me in detail. I was responding directly to the attitude you expressed.

If you want to start again, please excise the insults and respond directly to my substantive response:

Do you disagree with any of that?