Rumraket:
lee_merrill:
Actually, all but one of Stadler’s referenced papers were apparently authored by evolutionists! Who show no evidence in their papers from what I saw, that they are sympathetic to intelligent design. So if so, these authors cannot be thinking people? And evolution was not said in any referenced paper as “giving up”. The experimenters eventually stopped their experiments, presumably after an appropriate and reasonable number of generations.
Obviously you understood that the conclusion you are claiming can be drawn from these papers is not actually believed by the world’s biologists. And yet you really do claim that this conclusion can be drawn from these papers.
It then follows that you are drawing conclusions from these that basically all the worlds evolutionary biologists disagree with. And yet you still think we should. That means you are positing an absurdity.
So how are the papers not saying they encountered a limit at about two mutations? Please show how this is not their conclusion. And then show me where some biologists disagree with this limit. If most biologists do disagree, this should be easy to point to.