The conference led to a dedicated issue of Interface Focus (a Royal Society journal) in 2017. Müller’s review is linked below, and the rest of the issue is here. Some of the pieces are written by interesting and credible thinkers, some not (cf. James Shapiro). Müller’s piece heavily emphasizes evo-devo and its conceptual framework (at least as advanced by Kirschner and Gerhart two decades before).
IMO it’s still an interesting read, but it is glaringly dated in a many spots, as any scientist would expect of a 9-year-old review article. My position on the EES is that it was (and still is) a useful and somewhat fruitful “movement” to maintain the richness of topics and influences that matter in evolution. I was never convinced that it was a “new way,” at least not to the extent that its less-credible proponents holler about. But I like Kevin Lala a lot: a credible and wise voice, even when/if I think he goes too far. I bought his new book immediately, but have yet to start reading it. The authors are here.
I don’t see any value in a discussion with @lee_merrill but the thesis of Evolution Evolving is interesting and stimulating.