So we agree that there’s no point to ID then.
Did you finally figure out how working biologists use the term “fold”?
1 Like
That’s the entire point of ID. Evolution doesn’t negate design inferences. Natural history is irrelevant to a design conclusion.
Anyway, I’m not going to go 12 rounds with you today. You will never be convinced of anything. I’m merely here to describe to you what your field will look like and the sorts of research questions that will be pursued once you and everybody like you dies. I personally chose not to pursue it, but many did, and they are not going to hold their tongues after their careers are no longer threatened by the likes of you.
No it isn’t.
Sure I will. But I’m unlikely to be convinced by someone making so many laughably false claims.
You have yet to do anything of the sort. You’ve only shown that you don’t understand what a fold is.
And by the way, ID is flatlining.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q="intelligent%20design"
Many did not. In fact, we’ve been told here there’s no longer anyone doing any bench work at the Biologic Institute. How do you explain that? And what are you doing that’s so much more important? Why don’t you go work there? It seems as though you have no faith, Ben.
And I’ve never threatened anyone’s career.
2 Likes
If ID is on the rise, why is it that the DI can’t find enough takers for its expense-paid summer course?
2 Likes