Should RTB/OEC's Tweak Model in Light of New Data and if so How?

[anon46279830]

@gbrooks9

What I’m asking you is:

if we exclude Genesis 1 + 2 from any further reference…

What is your evidence … what is your Biblical Warrant, that there was a population in existence prior to the de novo creation of Adam/Eve?

Genesis chapters 3-11 contain multiple passages to support the position, along with passages in Romans, 1 Corinthians, and Hebrews. It is seeded throughout the Bible.

I refer you back to the videos in this link, the first of which you once described as “the heart of Genealogical Adam”, and it is as far as showing that the scriptures point to a population outside the garden which was already around when Adam and Eve came along.

Why the Bible Teaches a Framework for Genesis which is Consistent with GA

Apparently I could have made things a little easier on myself if I had started here by posting the video below. It says “the Bible Does not Teach that Adam is the Sole Father of the Human Race”. It is speaking genetically, not in terms of “falleness” or a spiritual version of “dark energy” or whatever one might call the trait which Joshua means when he speaks of Adam as the “sole progenitor.” In fact, the framework laid out in the video below has been called “the heart of Genealogical Adam” (GA) by another member of this forum… I thought so as well. When I came here I thought that this material was supplying the scriptural/theological framework which could support GA. And I don’t just mean the Genealogical Adam view of Adam. The GA model requires the flood to have been one which did not wipe out all of mankind either. This is because Joshua’s work in science says that the human race was not recently bottlenecked down to a single Y-chromosome as the traditional view, or even the RT…