The Argument Clinic

[Meerkat_SK5]

@CrisprCAS9

If you’re using fish in a biological sense, dogs and cats are fish. In which case, fish evolved into a more specialized type of fish.

I made the same argument when I suggested that the fine-tuned structure constant is the same as the universal common designer and you rejected it.

Without making any prior assumptions, How do you know dogs and cats are fish?

@CrisprCAS9

You are welcome to quote the relevant portion, but I don’t see it in that post. I strongly suspect you are mistaken about this.

It is really long though. Are you sure?

@RonSewell

You are attempting to deflect from your original inane post. I’m out.

That’s ok. @CrisprCAS9 answered the question for you and it was as expected.

@misterme987

That was not your original assertion. You seem to not understand what you have written.

Edit: For reference, here is Meerkat’s original assertion:

Yes, I should have said…

In contrast, you are assuming that dogs can, will, and did evolve into [and/or from] cats, fish, lizards, etc.