Introduction
Previously, I argued for an origin of life model that combines all three origins of virus models into a single hypothesis. More importantly, I showed how the first life on earth must have been created by a common designer that is transcendent. This inference was based on four premises:
(A) There are strong similarities between biochemical and human information [1][2]
(B) Experiments show how the first life must be created by an intelligent designer [3][4][5]
(C) Life could not have developed from metabolic-first prebiotic chemistry [5A]
(D) There is nothing in the physico-chemical world [apart from life] that resembles reactions being determined by the genetic code
However, there are observations that suggest this agent also guides the evolutionary process of developing life from simple to complex.[6][7]
So the question that comes up now isâŚ
Does Evolution proceed by Quantum consciousness?
According to literature, it has been repeatedly found that what initially seemed to be design flaws caused by an unguided process instead of a divine agent turned out not to be flaws at all with increasing understanding of the design. As a result, these observations have provided us good evidence and insight into the motives of this designer. [8]
In this article, I am going to be tying everything together that I argued, learned and discussed with everyone from previous topics.
Universal Quantum consciousness theory
Quantum Consciousness is the vital mechanism that causes life on earth to change over time [9]
Definitions:
Life: A non-local mathematical wave function [10]
Quantum consciousness: A non-local choice to create and move particles [11][12] [13]
Predictions
If my theory is trueâŚ
We should find novel genetic changes within one of Lenskiâs failed E.coli populations when genetically engineering only additive mutations.
If my theory is falseâŚ
(A) The one successful E.coli population will eventually produce one large mutational change causing a single-step speciation and produce an entire genome full of metainformation.
(B) Lenskiâs 11 other failed populations will eventually produce the same positive result.
(C) Metabolism-first pre-biotic experiments will produce a self-replicating molecule.
Methods
Falsification
Positive results within an (unguided) experiment that simulates a possible natural environment
Watch 8:30-13:00 and 18:00-19:30 for more on how this is a validated method. [14]
Verification
Negative results in (unguided) experiment + Positive results in (guided) experiment
Both these experiments must simulate the same natural environment from the past.
Read these sources for more on how this method of confirming design is valid. [15] [16]
Universal Common Designer Theory
All currently living organisms have a common design that can be traced back to a universal common designer.
How? Proton-tunneling and quantum entanglement [17][18]
Why? Make sure species survive, reproduce, and fill the biosphere [8]
Where? Every mutation is directly and indirectly caused for a specific purpose
When? From viruses leading up to humans and ongoing
Who? Jesus Christ who is both Divine and human [19]
What? A Self-collapsing Universal wave-function
Universal Common Design Model
Before the leftover meteorites were clumped together to form the primitive earth 3.8 billion years ago, virus-like RNA molecules were created within the deep-sea hypothermal vents of the earth. Then, some of these virus-like RNA molecules were naturally selected into different species of unicellular organisms and they underwent a heavy amount of HGT from the viruses that were created within the deep-sea oceans. [20]
Then, the designer re-used these microbes and chemical constituents to separately construct basic types of animals from different locations and times around the globe. These basic types would be able to adapt to changing environments and diversify into kinds over long epochs of time.
This would involve the designer employing many familiar mechanisms, such as HGT, to facilitate this process and address a common set of problems facing unrelated organisms that are undergoing natural selection. As a result, we would see biochemical and morphological similarities among all living things that naturally give the appearance of Universal common ancestry. [21][22]
What are basic types?
They are families and within each of these families contains different genera (such as, dog/fox/ wolf) and each genus contains one or more species.
This means that families are created (not genera or species) where there would be a basic type of dogs, which are the ancestor of all the different kinds of dogs that evolved afterwards.
How many groups of basic types are there?
According to the fossil record, we see the sudden appearances of [23]âŚâŚ
Avalon, Cambrian fauna, Ordovician, Nekton animals, Odontodes vertebrates, Land vertebrates, Insects, Dinosaurs/birds, Placental mammals, Genus Homo, and one Human pair
Why do shared similar ERVâs between species exhibit a nested hierarchy?
ERV sequences must resemble endogenized retroviruses in order to act as a defense mechanism against incoming harmful viruses.[24]
Why do shared similar pseudogenes between species exhibit a nested hierarchy?
The ceRNA hypothesis elegantly explains the widespread existence of pseudogenes in genomes and their structural similarity to intact genes.
What key predictions are different from Universal common descent?
(A) Functional/sequence convergence [25][26]
(B) Widespread examples of convergent evolution [27][28]
(C) Functional pseudogenes and ERVâs [29][30]
For more understanding and support for why these predictions are separate, please look into the cited sources. More importantly, please read and try to understand every other source I cited on here before responding on this topic.
[1] 200914771 9186âŚ9191 (duke.edu)
[2] Grammar of protein domain architectures | PNAS
[3] Poliovirus Baked From Scratch | Science | AAAS (sciencemag.org)
[4] Total synthesis of Escherichia coli with a recoded genome | Nature
[5] Prebiotic chemistry and human intervention | Nature Communications
[6] A wealth of discovery built on the Human Genome Project â by the numbers (nature.com)
[7] Evidence of non-random mutation rates suggests an evolutionary risk management strategy | Nature
[8] Optimal designs - Microsoft Word Online (live.com)
[9] Quantum Tunnelling to the Origin and Evolution of Life (nih.gov)
[10] Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction | Nature Physics
[11] The finer scale of consciousness: quantum theory (nih.gov)
[12] [1206.6578] Quantum erasure with causally disconnected choice (arxiv.org)
[14] God is not a Good Theory (Sean Carroll) - YouTube
[15] A 130,000-year-old archaeological site in southern California, USA | Nature
[17] Scientists Identify Fleeting Quantum Jitters that Drive Mutation Rate in DNA (genengnews.com)
[19] The Resurrection, Evidence, and The Scientist - The Veritas Forum - The Veritas Forum
[20] Would this Origin of life model work? - Peaceful Science
[22] Biased gene transfer mimics patterns created through shared ancestry | PNAS
[26] Evidence of a false thumb in a fossil carnivore clarifies the evolution of pandas | PNAS
[27] Convergent evolution seen in hundreds of genes | Nature
[28] Contingency and entrenchment in protein evolution under purifying selection | PNAS
[30] Plagiarized Errors and Molecular Genetics (talkorigins.org)
