@Tim remembers that Eddie has demonstrated zero understanding of how Wikipedia actually works, or its strengths and weaknesses, so:
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@Tim will however note with amusement that somebody who has repeatedly proven that he can’t research his way ‘out of a wet paper bag’, and has steadfastly refused to provide any substantiation on his own academic qualifications would accuse others of being “amateurs and dilettantes, writing about subjects in which they have zero academic training”
He would also note that the phrase “amateurs and dilettantes, writing about subjects in which they have zero academic training” could easily be applied to:
-
Michael Denton on the topic of Fine Tuning
-
Stephen Meyer on the topics of Paleontology, DNA, etc. etc
-
Michael Behe on the topics of all the example systems he gave for DBB, HIV & Malaria (EoE), Polar Bears etc (DD), Philosophy of Science (his Dover testimony), good courtroom practice (his ‘Kafkaesque’ accusation), etc, etc
Long-winded and self-serving defense of @Eddie’s further Denton-fanboying omitted with, you guessed it, a: