Yes, obviously. So you should not have said Wilipedia’s claim was “false and/or undocumented”, only that it was poorly documented.
That would be the discussion upthread of which I’ve just read the start.
Don’t assume that because you can’t remember anything above the current screenful and can’t be bothered to look (and don’t know how to use a search bar) that others are equally handicapped.
So you eagerly jumped in on a discussion.
@Eddie, you are (still) a hypocrite.