The Argument Clinic

[Roy (34-year veteran)]

@Eddie

@Tim

And the authors found that “Wikipedia articles which have received more revisions tend to be more neutral.” The more the crowd works on an article, the less biased it is.[1]

Rubbish. The articles on origins get hundreds of revisions, but don’t become more neutral as a result, because the atheist-materialist cabal that controls the articles simply reverses every change coming from outside the cabal, and the initial bias remains. This is evident to anyone who has closely studied the Talk pages and revision histories for several of the articles.

Which doesn’t include you, because you didn’t even know that Wikipedia has separate articles for ID and the ID movement, even though you claimed familiarity with ‘it’.