No it is the other way around. As I told guys on here, the type of service I purchased included peer-review along with editing services:
Scientific Review Report
TARGET TOP RATED JOURNALS WITH THE RIGHT EXPERTISE
A Scientific Review Report is created by peer reviewers for top journals like Nature, premium editors with 20+ years of experience, and our managing editors. This team of 3 experts shares critical feedback on improvements to your paper based on the scope of your target journal. Their feedback shortens the time a journal takes to evaluate your paper and increases your chances of acceptance in the high-impact journals.
Scientific Editing Services: Top Journal Editing by Scientific Publication Experts | Editage
No, I think it is the other way around.
I have made it very clear here that I was not planning on publishing this article directly. Instead, my plan was to make sure this paper has all the necessary elements in it to be a viable template for more qualified researchers to further develop this theory and model.
Right now, this paper is still considered a rough draft and will always be one until more competent Christian researchers take ownership of the content of this paper and make it robust and ready to submit to a theology, philosophy, or scientific journal themselves. They would be able to make the most out of it.
When that day comes, I will continue to improve on it , if need be, until the theory is a fully viable template for researchers to take it the next level.
So ,of course, it is still not perfect, but there are no major flaws nor is it lacking anything that would make it less than a scientific theory anymore.