The Argument Clinic

[colewd (Bill Cole)]

@Mercer

The “design argument” isn’t supported by evidence, and you know it, so you avoid evidence and misrepresent things that are not evidence as evidence. As in:

The design argument is supported by evidence. Your ideological objection to it makes it difficult to see the evidence. RMNS is not supported by the evidence.

@Mercer

That’s gibberish. We’ve also established that you don’t know what “model” means. I’ve never, ever seen anyone else refer to framing science with any model whatsoever.

Of course I know what a model is.

@Mercer

We do, but you refuse to look at any real evidence.

The evidence in your mind is the evidence that supports that God is not a tinkerer. Have you ever engaged in Behe’s model that shows the limitations of gene duplication and divergence as an evolutionary mechanism?