Why do yo think TE has echoed these bad design arguments? They just do not make sense, and are obviously loaded with the wrong theology.
I was surprised when Keith Fox used this versus Axe in the Henry Center exchange.
The book has an agenda for an anti creation view of the world. The section on reproduction is particularly bad, as it ignores the functional reasons for several of these cases of “bad” design.
Is it really? Who finds it convincing? It is not just bad theology and questionable science, but also against our instincts.