I am an independent thinker plenty educated and with working experience in many of the fields discussed.
- None of this is verifiable or visible. For this to mean anything you have to unmask yourself. Until then, it means nothing.
Nonlin.org:
My views are at times different than those of ID proponents (as in “microevolution”, “irreducible complexity”, “specified complexity”).
- Couldn’t tell at all from what you write. Why not go argue with them about what you disagree with?
Nonlin.org:
I am not so much arguing in favor of ID as I am arguing against the pseudoscience of Darwinist “evolution” (including its ‘neo’ and ‘neo’s neo’) and only with logic, observational, and in general scientific arguments.
- Darwinism has already been falsified. You missed the party by about 60 years. You will enjoy reading up on Haldane and Kimura’s work.
Nonlin.org:
Sorry to say this, but if you’re incapable of winning a scientific argument, you will have to ban me in an admission of defeat as did Biologos.
- I’m not trying to win a scientific argument with you.
No one in science cares who “wins” on forums in the internet with anonymous polemicists. I’m not engaging your arguments.