I’ll post that soon. Btw, thanks for writing that article.
That isn’t true. @Pnelson. Seems that you missed @naclhv and @jongarvey. WLC takes a variant of this (with Adam and Eve as more ancient) so he counts too. What most everyone agrees now is that it could be true, which is my main point.
What’s more, wouldn’t this objection be levied at Plantinga for his free will defense? He doesn’t argue that Molinism is true, but that if it were true this would resolve the apparent conflict, so we can’t claim these things are conflict any more. Can you point to any one who dismissed his logic merely because he hadn’t committed to Molinism being true? There would not be good logic to this at all.
Of course, after the fact, many people have argued that molinism is in fact true (@tim1). The same pattern is playing out for the GAE.